Why the study?
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately diagnose adrenal metastasis in lung cancer patients?
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately diagnose adrenal metastasis in lung cancer patients?
18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating adrenal metastasis from benign adrenal masses in lung cancer patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports 18F-FDG PET/CT as a highly reliable tool.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of adrenal metastasis in lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases published through 10 January 2017 on the role of F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating adrenal mass in lung cancer patients was performed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of F-FDG PET/CT on a per lesion-based analysis were calculated. The area under the curve was calculated to measure the accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT. RESULTS: A total of nine studies, involving 707 lung cancer patients with 810 adrenal masses, were included in the present meta-analysis. Of 810 adrenal masses from lung cancer, 411 (50.7%) and 399 (49.3%) masses were benign and metastatic, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of F-FDG PET/CT were 0.887 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.852-0.917], 0.908 (95% CI: 0.875-0.934), 8.552 (95% CI: 6.197-11.802), 0.090 (95% CI: 0.039-0.211), and 96.825 (95% CI: 40.402-232.05), respectively. In addition, the area under the curve was 0.9622 and the overall diagnostic accuracy (Q* index) was 0.9077, suggesting excellent performance. CONCLUSION: F-FDG PET/CT plays a vital role in the differentiation of adrenal metastasis from a benign adrenal mass in lung cancer patients, with excellent diagnostic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: