Key result
Contrast echocardiography successfully revealed severe apical hypertrophy (maximal thickness 3.6 cm) in an 84-year-old woman whose diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had been missed for 20 years.
Why the study?
Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosis can be challenging due to atypical clinical and EKG findings and potential difficulties in executing and interpreting echocardiography.
Does contrast echocardiography improve the diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in patients with poor endocardial border delineation?
Case Report (n=1)
Does contrast echocardiography improve the diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in patients with poor endocardial border delineation?
Contrast echocardiography is essential for diagnosing apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy when baseline echocardiography fails to adequately delineate the left ventricular apical endocardial border.
May support contrast echo for poorly visualized LV apices despite atypical ECG; leaves open whether earlier detection delays HF in ApHCM.
Background: Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM) is a rare form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which predominantly affects the apex of the left ventricle. The diagnosis can be challenging due to several factors, ranging from no typical clinical and electrocardiogram (EKG) findings to potential difficulties in executing and interpreting the echocardiographic examination. Case presentation: We report the case of an 84-year-old woman who came to our echo-lab to undergo a routine echocardiogram. She had a history of permanent atrial fibrillation, paced rhythm and previous episodes of heart failure (HF), allegedly explained by a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease that had been confirmed many times over the previous 20 years. The clinical examination and the EKG were unremarkable. The echocardiographic images were poor quality. But a senior cardiologist, expert in imaging and echocardiography, noted the lack of delineation of the endocardial border of the left ventricular (LV) apex region. Contrast echocardiography was performed and severe apical hypertrophy discovered. Conclusion: ApHCM can be a challenging diagnosis. Contrast echocardiography must always be applied in cases of poor delineation of the LV apical endocardial border at baseline echocardiography. Timely detection and appropriate lifestyle intervention might slow the development of LV hypertrophy, and possibly minimize and delay heart failure (HF) related symptoms and arrhythmias. The prognosis remains relatively benign during long term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caiati et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=1). Contrast echocardiography vs. Baseline echocardiography was evaluated on Diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Contrast echocardiography successfully revealed severe apical hypertrophy (maximal thickness 3.6 cm) in an 84-year-old woman whose diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had been missed for 20 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: