Why the study?
Does a pharmacist anticoagulant dosing service reduce the time to achieve therapeutic INR in patients requiring anticoagulation compared to doctor-managed dosing?
Does a pharmacist anticoagulant dosing service reduce the time to achieve therapeutic INR in patients requiring anticoagulation compared to doctor-managed dosing?
A pharmacist-led anticoagulant dosing service significantly reduces the time to achieve therapeutic INR compared to traditional doctor-managed dosing in an ambulatory care setting.
Pharmacist dosing was associated with faster therapeutic INR; leaves open whether RCTs will confirm clinical benefit or support adoption.
Aim To assess the effectiveness of a pharmacist anticoagulant dosing service in an ambulatory care program at an Australian hospital. Method A pre‐ and post‐intervention study method was used. The pre‐intervention group consisted of patients admitted for anticoagulation to the Hospital‐in‐the‐Home program from September 2009 to January 2010, where warfarin was managed by doctors from the treating unit. The post‐intervention group consisted of patients enrolled in the pharmacist dosing service from February 2010 to October 2010. Eligibility criteria for enrolment in the pharmacy dosing service included: admission to the Hospital‐in‐the‐Home program for anticoagulation; warfarin dosing initiated in line with the existing hospital anticoagulation guidelines (modified to accommodate a pharmacist dosing service); medical unit consent for patient inclusion; and patients able to undergo daily INR blood tests. Results The mean number of days for a patient to achieve 2 consecutive therapeutic international normalised ratios was 8.8 days for the pharmacist dosing service (n = 35) and 11.8 days for the pre‐intervention group (n = 53) (p = 0.002). There was no difference in the mean number of international normalised ratios measured between the two groups. Conclusion A pharmacist anticoagulant dosing service effectively managed warfarin dosing in patients admitted to an ambulatory care program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dooley et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: