Why the study?
Does spectral transfer function (STF) gain between end-diastolic pressure and stroke volume index accurately assess right ventricular stiffness in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension?
Does spectral transfer function (STF) gain between end-diastolic pressure and stroke volume index accurately assess right ventricular stiffness in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension?
Spectral transfer function gain analysis of respiratory fluctuations between end-diastolic pressure and stroke volume index can assess right ventricular stiffness, offering a potential prognostic tool in pulmonary hypertension.
May enable RV stiffness assessment via STF in experimental PH; leaves open clinical translation and prognostic value.
Recent studies suggest right ventricular (RV) stiffness is important in pulmonary hypertension (PH) prognosis. Smaller stroke volume (SV) variation after a certain RV end-diastolic pressure (EDP) respiratory variation as assessed by spectral transfer function (STF) may identify RV stiffness. Our aim was to evaluate RV stiffness in monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PH progression and to validate STF gain between EDP and SV as marker of stiffness. Seven-week-old male Wistar rats randomly injected with 60 mg/kg MCT or vehicle were divided into three groups ( n = 12 each) according to cardiac index (CI): controls (Ctrl), preserved CI (MCT pCI), and reduced CI (MCT rCI). All underwent RV pressure-volume (PV) evaluation 24–34 days after MCT, under halogenate anesthesia and constant positive-pressure ventilation. End-diastolic stiffness (β i ), end-systolic elastance (Ees i ), arterial elastance for indexed volumes (Ea i ), and preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) were obtained and beat-to-beat fluctuations during ventilation assessed by STF. Ea i was the strongest determinant of CI, alongside β i but not PRSW. MCT rCI showed impaired ventricular-vascular coupling (VVC) and higher β i , along with low end-diastolic pressure (EDP) and stroke volume index (SV i ) STF gain, denoting impaired preload reserve. On multivariate analysis β i and not Ees i correlated with EDP-SV i STF gain ( P < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of EDP-SV i STF gain showed an area under curve of 0.84 for β i prediction ( P = 0.002). Afterload, impaired VVC and RV stiffness are major players in RV failure. RV stiffness can be assessed by STF gain analysis of respiratory fluctuations between EDP and SV i , which may constitute a prognostic tool in PH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alaa et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: