This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction 18F-FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool for staging and treatment monitoring of melanoma, as melanoma cells usually present with a high avidity for 18F-FDG [ 1 ] [ 2 ]. However, there are some common and specific pitfalls that can lead to false-positives and false-negatives [ 3 ]. False-positives are often due to infections or inflammatory diseases [ 4 ]. When monitoring response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, particular attention must be paid to pseudoprogression or to immune related effects. False-negatives may occur for reasons related to patient preparation such as incomplete fasting, hyperglycaemia or hyperinsulinaemia [ 5 ]. Antitumoral medication, if started before the baseline scan, or anti-inflammatory drugs such as glucosteroid (which can also cause hyperglycaemia) may also reduce 18F-FDG uptake. Necrotic lesions may show reduced or no uptake, and small lesions (e.g., in-transit metastases) are prone to partial volume effect. BRAF mutation status is an important parameter in the management of melanoma but does not appear to correlate with 18F-FDG uptake. Publication History Received: 05 August 2024 Accepted: 06 August 2024 Article published online: 04 December 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ternoy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: