Key result
The automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer showed excellent reliability compared to the manual Chrono-log 700 for assessing VWF:RCo activity (ICC 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.86).
Why the study?
Manual aggregometry for VWF ristocetin cofactor activity is the reference method despite high inter-laboratory variability, whereas automated analyzers offer advantages for routine testing.
Does the automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer provide comparable VWF:RCo activity measurements to the manual Chrono-log 700 in patients suspected of having VWD?
Cross-Sectional (n=136)
Blinded analysis
Does the automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer provide comparable VWF:RCo activity measurements to the manual Chrono-log 700 in patients suspected of having VWD?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.86)
p-value: p=<0.0001
The automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer provides comparable accuracy and precision to manual aggregometry for assessing VWF:RCo activity in suspected VWD.
Objectives A variety of methods are currently used to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity, but still the VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay using the manual aggregometry technique is the reference method, even having high inter-laboratory variability. The automated coagulation analyzers offer several advantages for routine testing. Herein the performance of the automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer was compared to the manual aggregometer Chrono-log 700 for assessing VWF:Co activity in patients suspected of having von Willebrand disease (VWD). Methods Plasma samples from 136 patients were prospectively collected, and blindly analyzed on both instruments, simultaneously. Linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman test, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and area under receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the performance of the automated VWF:RCo assay. Results There was a strong positive correlation between the two assays (r=0.86, p<0.0001) with an excellent reliability ICC value of 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.74–0.86). A very good degree of agreement between the two assays was also evidenced with an estimated bias of −0.055 (−0.58 to 0.46). The ROC curve for the automated VWF:RCo assay was 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.78–0.92; p<0.0001). Using a cut-off value of 0.44 UI/mL for VWF:RCo activity, the sensitivity and specificity values were 91.2 %, and 88.2 % for the automated assay. The positive and negative positive values for VWD detection were 72.9 %, and 96.7 %, respectively. Conclusions Collectively, these findings indicate that the automated VWF:RCo assay yields comparable results to the manual aggregometry assay, with very good accuracy and precision to help diagnose patients suspected with VWD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boulassel et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected von Willebrand disease (VWD) (n=136). Automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer vs. Manual aggregometer Chrono-log 700 was evaluated on Reliability of VWF:RCo activity assessment (ICC 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.86, p=<0.0001). The automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer showed excellent reliability compared to the manual Chrono-log 700 for assessing VWF:RCo activity (ICC 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: