Why the study?
Is increased myocardial ultrasonic reflectivity associated with the severity of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy?
Is increased myocardial ultrasonic reflectivity associated with the severity of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy?
Increased myocardial wall reflectivity, an index of collagen content, is detectable primarily in extreme forms of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.
Myocardial reflectivity may index fibrosis mainly in severe hypertensive LVH; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
We assessed myocardial reflectivity pattern in a large spectrum of left ventricular mass values, covering the extremes from absent to severe myocardial hypertensive hypertrophy. Quantitatively assessed ultrasonic backscatter is an index of ultrasonic tissue characterization directly related to the morphometrically evaluated collagen content in humans. We enrolled 88 essential hypertensives. With an echo prototype implemented in our Institute, integrated values of the radiofrequency signal of myocardial walls were obtained and normalized for those of the pericardium (Integrated Backscatter Index, IBI, %). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was measured by Devereux formula. There was a weak correlation between septal IBI and LVMI (r = 0.35; P < .001). On the basis of LVMI values, three groups of hypertensives were identified, with absent (Group I, n = 23; LVMI < 125 g/m2), mild to moderate (Group II, n = 44; LVMI from 125 to 174 g/m2), or severe (Group III, n = 21; LVMI > 175 g/m2) left ventricular hypertrophy. The Integrated Backscatter Index in the septum was lower in patients of Group I (IBI = 23.3% +/- 3.6%) and II (IBI = 26.5 +/- 7.6; P = NS v Group I), in comparison with patients of Group III (IBI = 31.1 +/- 5.9; P < .02 v II; P < .0001 v I). An increased myocardial wall reflectivity is detectable only in the presence of extreme forms of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lucarini et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: