Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 6, 2006CirculationOpen Access

One-Shock Versus Three-Shock Defibrillation Protocol Significantly Improves Outcome in a Porcine Model of Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WTWanchun TangCross-Cutting CardiologyDSDavid SnyderECRI InstituteJWJinglan WangTianjin University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

1-shock protocol may boost survival in prolonged VF; leaves open translation to human resuscitation guidelines.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Tang et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a80a43e03a7c7d587cafda3https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.592121
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Wide variation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption intervals among commercially available automated external defibrillators may affect survival despite high defibrillation efficacy2004 · 66 citations
  2. 2A Model of Ischemically Induced Ventricular Fibrillation for Comparison of Fixed‐dose and Escalating‐dose Defibrillation Strategies2004 · 20 citations
  3. 3Adverse Outcomes of Interrupted Precordial Compression During Automated Defibrillation2002 · 450 citations
  4. 4Efficacy of lower-energy biphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation:*1A follow-up clinical study2004 · 23 citations
  5. 5Augmented efficacy of external CPR by intermittent occlusion of the ascending aorta.1993 · 59 citations