Key result
Canagliflozin reduced NT-proBNP concentrations by 11% versus placebo at 1 year (geometric mean ratio 0.89; 95% CI 0.84-0.94; P<0.001), explaining 10.4% of its effect on heart failure events.
Why the study?
Canagliflozin reduces cardiovascular events including hospitalization for heart failure in type 2 diabetes with cardiovascular risk, and elevated NT-proBNP predicts cardiovascular risk; the study aimed to evaluate NT-proBNP in CANVAS participants.
Does canagliflozin reduce NT-proBNP concentrations compared to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk?
RCT (n=4,330)
Does canagliflozin reduce NT-proBNP concentrations compared to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk?
Canagliflozin modestly reduces NT-proBNP levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk, though this reduction mediates only a small proportion of its clinical benefit on heart failure events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NT-proBNP reduction mediates only a minor fraction of canagliflozin's HF benefit; extends evidence that SGLT2i effects are largely NT-proBNP independent.
BACKGROUND: Canagliflozin reduces cardiovascular events including hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Elevated amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations are associated with HF diagnosis and predict cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure NT-proBNP in CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) participants. METHODS: Associations between baseline NT-proBNP and cardiovascular, renal, and mortality outcomes and intervention-associated changes were determined. RESULTS: Of the 4,330 participants in the CANVAS trial, NT-proBNP was measured in 3,587, 2,918, and 995 participants at baseline, 1 year, and 6 years, respectively. The median baseline NT-proBNP concentration was 91 pg/ml, and 39.3% had NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/ml. NT-proBNP was higher in those with investigator-reported HF (13% of participants at baseline) versus those without (187 pg/ml vs. 81 pg/ml), with substantial overlap between groups. By 1 year, NT-proBNP increased with placebo, whereas canagliflozin reduced NT-proBNP by 11% (geometric mean ratio for canagliflozin vs. placebo = 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84 to 0.94]; p < 0.001). Lower NT-proBNP with canagliflozin was also observed at 6 years (p = 0.004). In adjusted models, baseline NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/ml was prognostic for incident HHF (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.40; 95% CI: 2.67 to 10.9), HHF/cardiovascular death (HR: 3.52; 95% CI: 2.38 to 5.20), and all-cause death (HR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.78 to 3.61). Mediation analyses suggested that 10.4% of the effects of canagliflozin on HHF were reflected in NT-proBNP lowering. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of patients in the CANVAS trial had elevated NT-proBNP values. Canagliflozin reduced NT-proBNP concentrations versus placebo; however, reduction in NT-proBNP explained only a small proportion of the benefit of canagliflozin on HF events. (CANVAS [CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study]; NCT01032629).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Januzzi et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk (n=4,330). Canagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in NT-proBNP concentration at 1 year (geometric mean ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94, p=< 0.001). Canagliflozin reduced NT-proBNP concentrations by 11% versus placebo at 1 year (geometric mean ratio 0.89; 95% CI 0.84-0.94; P<0.001), explaining 10.4% of its effect on heart failure events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: