Key result
Among high-risk patients with moderate/severe chronic kidney disease, TAVR resulted in a lower 3-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular and renal events compared with SAVR (42.1% vs. 51.0%, P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does TAVR reduce MACRE compared to SAVR in high-risk patients with moderate/severe CKD?
Population
High-risk patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement, retrospectively stratified…
Comparison
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)
Design
Cohort, Patients were originally randomized to TAVR or SAVR in the CoreValve…
Follow-up
3 years
Authors
Loading...
TAVR was associated with lower MACRE in high-risk moderate/severe CKD; leaves open whether RCTs will confirm benefit versus SAVR.
RCT (n=3,733)
randomized
Does TAVR reduce MACRE compared to SAVR in high-risk patients with moderate/severe CKD?
Absolute Event Rate: 42.1% vs 51%
p-value: p=.04
TAVR is associated with lower 3-year MACRE compared to SAVR in high-risk patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.
Pineda et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Aortic valve disease with chronic kidney disease (n=3,733). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on major adverse cardiovascular and renal events (MACRE), a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, and new requirement of dialysis (p=.04). Among high-risk patients with moderate/severe chronic kidney disease, TAVR resulted in a lower 3-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular and renal events compared with SAVR (42.1% vs. 51.0%, P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: