In vitro study demonstrates antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of zinc-doped iron oxide nanoparticles against pathogenic bacteria, suggesting potential against antibiotic resistance.
The global mortality rate from antimicrobial-resistant infections is steadily rising, driven primarily by the widespread use of antibiotics in the last decades, a problem exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The exponential growth of antimicrobial resistance far outpaces the current development of new antibiotics. One promising strategy to counteract the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is the use of nanomaterials as antimicrobial agents. In recent works, Zinc-Doped Iron Oxide Zn x Fe 3– x O 4 nanoparticles (NPs) have been demonstrated as a highly efficient cancer theranostics agent capable of several different, complementary, therapeutic routes, depending on the Zn doping concentration. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time the interesting antibacterial effects of this nanomaterial, investigating the interactions of Zn x Fe 3– x O 4 NPs with various Zn concentrations (0.2 %, 1 %, 1.5 %, 2 %) with two opportunistic pathogens: the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus and the Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa , both of which are among the top resistant nosocomial pathogens, and model organisms. We adopt a holistic approach, looking at: ( i ) the antimicrobial effects of Zn x Fe 3– x O 4 NPs, either alone, or in combination with two antibiotics, gentamicin (CN) and ciprofloxacin (CIP), ( ii ) their efficacy at dispersing bacterial planktonic aggregates, and ( iii ) their inhibitory properties of biofilm formation. Last, we employ Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) for qualitative and quantitative analyses of bacterial cells treated with CIP, CN, and Zn x Fe 3– x O 4 NPs to enable knowledge of the mechanisms of antibacterial action of the latter. TEM micrographs of Zn x Fe 3– x O 4 NPs, investigated as antibacterial nanoagents
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asaftei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: