Why the study?
Does direct visualization with luminal contrast correlate with pre-acquired CT scan for assessing oesophageal position in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Does direct visualization with luminal contrast correlate with pre-acquired CT scan for assessing oesophageal position in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Reliance on pre-acquired CT scans for determining oesophageal position during AF ablation under general anaesthesia may be misleading, as it fails to correlate with real-time position in over 40% of patients.
Pre-acquired CT may misrepresent oesophageal position during AF ablation; leaves open whether real-time visualization improves procedural safety.
AIMS: Atrio-oesophageal fistula is a rare but often fatal complication of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Various strategies are employed to evaluate the oesophageal position in relation to the posterior left atrium (LA). These include segmentation of the oesophagus from a pre-acquired computed tomography (CT) scan and direct, real-time assessment of the oesophageal position using contrast at the time of the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients with drug-refractory AF underwent CT scanning prior to AF ablation. The LA and oesophagus were segmented from this scan. The oesophagus was deemed midline, ostial if it crossed directly behind any of the pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, or antral if it passed within 5 mm of a PV ostium. Under general anaesthesia at the time of ablation, the same patients were administered contrast via an oro-gastric tube to outline the oesophagus. Catheters were placed at the PV ostia and oesophageal position in relation to the PVs was established radiographically using a postero-anterior view. Oesophageal position assessed by real-time assessment correlated with the CT scan in only 59% of patients. In 34% the oesophagus was more right sided on direct visualization, while in 7% it was more left sided. CONCLUSION: Segmentation of the oesophagus from the CT scan did not correlate the real-time oesophageal position at the time of the procedure in over 40% of patients under general anaesthesia. Reliance on the determination of oesophageal position by previously acquired CT may be misleading at best and provide a false sense of security when ablating in the posterior LA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavin et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: