This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
widely distributed across the tree of life. Despite significant expansion in plants, knowledge about this domain remains inadequate in plants. In this work, we explore the role of cavity architectural modulations in START protein evolution and functional diversity. We use deep-learning approaches to generate plant START domain models, followed by surface accessibility studies and a comprehensive structural investigation of the rice START family. We validate 28 rice START domain models, delineate binding cavities, measure pocket volumes, and compare these with mammalian counterparts to understand evolution of binding preferences. Overall, plant START domains retain the ancestral α/β helix-grip signature, but we find subtle variation in cavity architectures, resulting in significantly smaller ligand-binding tunnels in the plant kingdom. We identify cavity lining residues (CLRs) responsible for reduction in ancestral tunnel space, and these appear to be class specific, and unique to plants, providing a mechanism for the observed shift in domain function. For instance, mammalian cavity lining residues A135, G181 and A192 have evolved to larger CLRs across the plant kingdom, contributing to smaller sizes, minimal STARTs being the largest, while members of type-IV HD-Zip family show almost complete obliteration of lipid binding cavities, consistent with their present-day DNA binding functions. In summary, this work quantifies plant START structural & functional divergence, bridging current knowledge gaps.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahtha et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: