Why the study?
Does the use of a clerking pro forma improve documentation standards in vascular surgery patients clerked by junior doctors?
Does the use of a clerking pro forma improve documentation standards in vascular surgery patients clerked by junior doctors?
The introduction of a clerking pro forma significantly improves the quality of history and examination documentation by junior doctors for vascular surgery patients.
May support pro forma use in vascular surgery clerking; hypothesis-generating for outcomes and broader adoption.
At our institution, a large tertiary referral centre for vascular surgery, patients are often admitted directly to the ward and clerked by foundation year one (FY1) doctors. We found that these clerkings frequently fell short of national record keeping standards, potentially leading to an increased risk for patients during their hospital stay. In addition, we found that junior doctors did not feel confident in clerking vascular surgery patients. A literature review found that high quality clerkings were strongly linked to improved patient safety, and that the use of a pro forma was one method to improve compliance with documentation guidelines. We devised a clerking pro forma based on national guidelines and introduced it to the department. We found that the use of a pro forma significantly improved documentation standards across a number of domains, including patient demographics, presenting complaint, and family and social histories (p <0.05). Examinations were significantly more comprehensive, with cardiac and vascular examination as well as peripheral pulses documented (p <0.05). In conclusion, we found that using a pro forma helped to aid junior doctors in clerking new patients, and significantly improved the quality of their history and examinations. This leads to a potential positive impact on patient safety during their inpatient stay, and should be rolled out more widely across the hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kentley et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: