Why the study?
Does an IR-UWB radar sensor accurately measure heart rate and detect atrial fibrillation compared to standard ECG in healthy volunteers and patients with AF?
Does an IR-UWB radar sensor accurately measure heart rate and detect atrial fibrillation compared to standard ECG in healthy volunteers and patients with AF?
IR-UWB radar provides a highly accurate, non-contact method for measuring heart rate and detecting atrial fibrillation, though current limitations require breath-holding during measurement.
May enable non-contact AF screening with breath-holding; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
We discovered that impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar could recognize cardiac motions in a non-contact fashion. Therefore, we measured the heart rate (HR) and rhythms using an IR-UWB radar sensor and evaluated the validity and reliability of the measurements in comparison to electrocardiography. The heart beats were measured in 6 healthy volunteers (18 samples) with normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and 16 patients (36 samples) with atrial fibrillation (AF) using both an IR-UWB radar sensor and electrocardiography simultaneously. The participants hold their breath for 20 seconds during the data acquisition. In subjects with NSR, there was excellent agreement of HR (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.856), average R-R interval (ICC 0.997) and individual R-R intervals between the two methods (ICC 0.803). In subjects with AF, HR (ICC 0.871) and average R-R interval (ICC 0.925) from the radar sensor also agreed well with those from electrocardiography, though there was a small disagreement in the individual R-R intervals between the two methods (ICC 0.697). The rhythms computed by the signal-processing algorithm showed good agreement between the two methods (Cohen's Kappa 0.922). The IR-UWB radar sensor is precise and accurate for assessing HR and rhythms in a non-contact fashion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: