Why the study?
Anthracyclines like doxorubicin are associated with cardiotoxic side effects, motivating the investigation of long-term cardiotoxicity findings in patients treated with doxorubicin and concomitant metoprolol or enalapril 10 years earlier.
Does concomitant metoprolol or enalapril prevent doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in lymphoma patients?
Does concomitant metoprolol or enalapril prevent doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in lymphoma patients?
In a 10-year follow-up of lymphoma patients treated with doxorubicin, neither metoprolol nor enalapril provided additional benefit in preventing cardiotoxicity, as no long-term cardiotoxicity was observed in the cohort.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Omitting metoprolol or enalapril prophylaxis is safe in doxorubicin-treated lymphoma patients; confirms low 10-year cardiotoxicity risk without intervention.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, though widely used in anticancer therapy, they are associated with cardiotoxic side-effects. The aim of this trial was to investigate long-term follow-up cardiotoxicity findings in patients treated with doxorubicin and concomitant metoprolol or enalapril 10 years earlier. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 147 patients were randomized into the treatment arms. A total of 125 patients treated with doxorubicin without evidence of heart disease at the start of chemotherapy were analyzed. They were followed-up for up to 10 years after treatment start. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 47 patients completed the follow-up and 21 patients died, none due to cardiotoxicity events. Clinical signs of heart failure were not seen in any patients and no statistically significant differences between baseline and 10-year findings were seen for echocardiographic variables. No evidence of long-term cardiotoxicity was seen and nor metoprolol or enalapril offered an additional benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georgakopoulos et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: