Key result
Enalapril therapy produced transient LV improvements that deteriorated by 6-10 years, with 6/6 patients with baseline heart failure dying or requiring transplant versus 3/12 asymptomatic patients.
Why the study?
Does long-term enalapril therapy improve left ventricular structure and function in doxorubicin-treated survivors of childhood cancer?
Population
18 doxorubicin-treated survivors of childhood cancer with left ventricular dysfunction.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 10 years
Authors
Loading...
Caution against expecting sustained LV benefit from enalapril in doxorubicin survivors; leaves open need for durable therapies and randomized trials.
Cohort (n=18)
Does long-term enalapril therapy improve left ventricular structure and function in doxorubicin-treated survivors of childhood cancer?
In doxorubicin-treated childhood cancer survivors, enalapril provides only transient improvement in left ventricular structure and function, with eventual deterioration and poor outcomes in those with baseline heart failure.
Lipshultz et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Left ventricular dysfunction in doxorubicin-treated survivors of childhood cancer (n=18). Enalapril was evaluated on Left ventricular structure and function (LV dimension, afterload, fractional shortening, mass, and wall thickness). Enalapril therapy produced transient LV improvements that deteriorated by 6-10 years, with 6/6 patients with baseline heart failure dying or requiring transplant versus 3/12 asymptomatic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: