Why the study?
Do intravenous iron supplements improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency?
Do intravenous iron supplements improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This consensus statement outlines diagnostic criteria and treatment recommendations for managing iron deficiency in heart failure with intravenous iron.
Summary Iron deficiency (ID) is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF), affecting 55% of chronic and up to 80% of acute HF patients, regardless of ejection fraction (EF). An ID is associated with reduced quality of life, impaired exercise capacity (VO 2 peak), higher hospitalization rate and lower survival rate. It is also an independent predictor of HF outcomes. This consensus statement critically reviews the diagnostic criteria for ID in HF and provides recommendations for their use. The efficacy and safety of intravenous iron supplements, including ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and ferric derisomaltose (FDI), are analyzed highlighting the indications and potential adverse effects. Key clinical trials and guideline recommendations are summarized. In summary, the document addresses the diagnostics, treatment and monitoring of ID in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Messner et al. (2025) conducted a review in Heart failure with iron deficiency. Intravenous iron supplements (ferric carboxymaltose and ferric derisomaltose) was evaluated. This consensus statement reviews the diagnosis of iron deficiency in heart failure and the efficacy and safety of intravenous iron supplements, including ferric carboxymaltose and ferric derisomaltose.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: