Why the study?
The mechanisms underlying low-energy antifibrillation pacing to terminate fibrillation with lower per-pulse energy than single high-energy shocks were not fully understood.
Low-energy antifibrillation pacing can successfully terminate fibrillation driven by stable rotors with substantially lower energy than single shocks in a computational model.
Hypothesis-generating for low-energy rotor termination in animals; leaves open clinical translation and human trials.
Recent experimental studies have shown that a sequence of low-energy electrical far-field pulses is able to terminate fibrillation with substantially lower per-pulse energy than a single high-energy electric shock (see S Luther et al Nature 475 235–39). During this low-energy antifibrillation pacing (LEAP) procedure only tissue near sufficiently large conduction heterogeneities, such as large coronary arteries, is activated. In order to understand the mechanism behind LEAP, we have carried out a statistical study of resetting a medium filled by one or more stable spirals (‘rotors’) in a two-dimensional electrophysiological model of cardiac tissue perforated by blood vessels to the resting state (‘defibrillation’). We found the highest success probabilities for this defibrillation for underdrive pacing with periods 10–20 percent larger than the dominant period of the stable rotors in the unperturbed dynamics. If a sufficiently large number pulses is applied and an optimal pacing period chosen, the energy per pulse required for successful defibrillation is about 75–80 percent lower than the energy needed for single-shock defibrillation. Optimal conditions to control and suppress fibrillation based on stable rotors, hence, are similar to the ones in found for the case of an electrophysiological model displaying spatiotemporal chaos (‘electrical turbulence’) in an earlier study (see P Buran et al 2017 Chaos 27 113110). The optimal pacing period is found to increase with increasing strength of the electrical field strength used in the model. The success probability also increases strongly until the fourth or fifth pulse administered, which is strongly correlated to an observed increase of the fraction of re-excitable tissue with each subsequent pulse. Monitoring the fraction of excitable tissue in the model as key quantity of the excitable medium, moreover, enabled us to successfully predict the optimal pacing period for defibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buran et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: