Key result
Adaptive deceleration pacing using pulse trains with increasing temporal intervals provided high success rates at low energies for terminating spiral wave chaos in numerical simulations.
Why the study?
Sequences of weak electrical pulses are considered a promising alternative to terminate ventricular and atrial fibrillation while avoiding strong defibrillation shocks with adverse side effects.
Does adaptive deceleration pacing terminate spiral wave chaos at low energies in numerical simulations of 2D excitable media?
Does adaptive deceleration pacing terminate spiral wave chaos at low energies in numerical simulations of 2D excitable media?
Adaptive deceleration pacing, calculated from the frequency spectrum, offers a promising low-energy approach to terminating cardiac arrhythmias in computational models.
May inform low-energy defibrillation strategies; leaves open translation from simulations to clinical arrhythmias.
Sequences of weak electrical pulses are considered a promising alternative for terminating ventricular and atrial fibrillations while avoiding strong defibrillation shocks with adverse side effects. In this study, using numerical simulations of four different 2D excitable media, we show that pulse trains with increasing temporal intervals between successive pulses (deceleration pacing) provide high success rates at low energies. Furthermore, we propose a simple and robust approach to calculate inter-pulse spacing directly from the frequency spectrum of the dynamics (for instance, computed based on the electrocardiogram), which can be practically used in experiments and clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lilienkamp et al. (2022) studied Ventricular and atrial fibrillations. Adaptive deceleration pacing was evaluated on Termination of spiral wave chaos. Adaptive deceleration pacing using pulse trains with increasing temporal intervals provided high success rates at low energies for terminating spiral wave chaos in numerical simulations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: