Why the study?
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring improve the classification of blood pressure control compared to clinic blood pressure in patients treated for hypertension?
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring improve the classification of blood pressure control compared to clinic blood pressure in patients treated for hypertension?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides additional clinical value over clinic blood pressure measurements by identifying masked uncontrolled hypertension in general practice.
ABPM may detect masked uncontrolled hypertension missed by clinic readings; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is being increasingly used in general practice. There is at present little published evidence regarding the clinical utility of ABPM in the care of patients with established hypertension in this setting. We examined this issue by undertaking ABPM in a group of patients with established hypertension. 40 patients (aged 33-60 years) currently being treated for hypertension were randomly selected from a general practice list and underwent a single 24-hour ABPM study. ABPM values were compared with clinic blood pressure (CBP) values obtained on the day of monitoring together with previous readings taken by the general practitioner (GP). In the case of mean arterial pressure, 24-hour, awake and asleep ABPM values were found to underestimate CBP values by 14 mmHg (95% confidence interval 11-16 mmHg), 9 mmHg (95% C16-12 mmHg) and 24 mmHg (95% CI 21-27 mmHg), respectively. When used to classify blood pressure control, ABPM values produced equivalent results to CBP except by the criterion of BP load, for which 24-hour ABPM showed a higher rate of unsatisfactory control. 5 patients classified by CBP to have satisfactory BP control according to current international guidelines were found to have unsatisfactory BP control by ABPM. This study demonstrates the potential value of ABPM in patients with essential hypertension in a general practice setting. ABPM provided information over and above that obtained by CBP in a substantial proportion of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: