Why the study?
Heterogeneity in the definitions of myocardial injury contributes to difficulty in evaluating the value of cardiac troponin measurement in perioperative care.
Does perioperative cardiac troponin surveillance improve risk stratification and outcomes in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery?
Does perioperative cardiac troponin surveillance improve risk stratification and outcomes in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery?
Perioperative troponin surveillance aids in risk stratification beyond the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and allows early identification of acute myocardial injury in noncardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support troponin surveillance for risk stratification beyond RCRI; leaves open whether it improves outcomes.
Myocardial injury is now an acknowledged complication in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Heterogeneity in the definitions of myocardial injury contributes to difficulty in evaluating the value of cardiac troponins (cTns) measurement in perioperative care. Pre-, post-, and peri-operatively increased cTns are encompassed by the umbrella term 'myocardial injury' and are likely to reflect different pathophysiological mechanisms. Increased cTns are independently associated with cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular complications, poor short-term and long-term cardiovascular outcomes, and increased mortality. Preoperative measurement of cTns aids preoperative risk stratification beyond the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. Systematic measurement detects acute perioperative increases and allows early identification of acute myocardial injury. Common definitions and standards for reporting are a prerequisite for designing impactful future trials and perioperative management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chew et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: