Experimental study reports first evidence of the rare B+ to pi+ e+ e- decay in proton-proton collisions, indicating consistency with the Standard Model.
The first evidence for the decay <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi>B</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>+</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:msup> <a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi>π</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>+</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:msup> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi>e</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>+</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:msup> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi>e</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>−</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:msup> </a:mrow> </a:math> is reported using proton-proton collision data recorded by the LHCb experiment at center-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:mn>9</d:mn> <d:mtext> </d:mtext> <d:mtext> </d:mtext> <d:msup> <d:mi>fb</d:mi> <d:mrow> <d:mo>−</d:mo> <d:mn>1</d:mn> </d:mrow> </d:msup> </d:math> . A signal excess with a significance of <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <f:mrow> <f:mn>3.2</f:mn> <f:mi>σ</f:mi> </f:mrow> </f:math> is observed and the branching fraction is measured to be <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <h:mrow> <h:mi mathvariant="script">B</h:mi> <h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo> <h:msup> <h:mrow> <h:mi>B</h:mi> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>+</h:mo> </h:mrow> </h:msup> <h:mo stretchy="false">→</h:mo> <h:msup> <h:mrow> <h:mi>π</h:mi> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>+</h:mo> </h:mrow> </h:msup> <h:msup> <h:mrow> <h:mi>e</h:mi> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>+</h:mo> </h:mrow> </h:msup> <h:msup> <h:mrow> <h:mi>e</h:mi> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>−</h:mo> </h:mrow> </h:msup> <h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo> <h:mo>=</h:mo> <h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo> <h:msubsup> <h:mrow> <h:mn>2.4</h:mn> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>−</h:mo> <h:mn>0.8</h:mn> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>+</h:mo> <h:mn>0.9</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:msubsup> <h:msubsup> <h:mrow> <h:mtext> </h:mtext> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>−</h:mo> <h:mn>0.2</h:mn> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>+</h:mo> <h:mn>0.4</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:msubsup> <h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo> <h:mo>×</h:mo> <h:msup> <h:mrow> <h:mn>10</h:mn> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mo>−</h:mo> <h:mn>8</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:msup> </h:mrow> </h:math> , where the first set of uncertainties is statistical and the second is systematic. The result is consistent with the Standard Model expectation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aaij et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: