This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil cell population data (CPD), including fluorescent light intensity (NE-SFL) and side scatter (NE-SSC), are promising inflammatory markers in human sepsis but remain unexplored in dogs and cats. OBJECTIVES: Determine the diagnostic utility of NE-SSC and NE-SFL for detecting systemic inflammation in dogs and cats. METHODS: Dogs and cats with archived CPD, blood films, and acute phase protein (APP) measurements were included. Increased C-reactive protein (CRP) in dogs and Serum Amyloid A (SAA) in cats were considered indicative of systemic inflammation. CPD was compared with APPs, white cell count (WCC), neutrophil count, band neutrophil count, and toxic change grade. Optimal cut-offs and associated sensitivities and specificities were calculated using ROC curve analysis. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's coefficient. RESULTS: NE-SFL and NE-SSC were significantly increased in dogs and cats with systemic inflammation. The area under the curve (AUC) of NE-SFL was higher than that of NE-SSC, WCC, and band neutrophil count in both dogs (0.82) and cats (0.77). The optimal NE-SFL cut-off for detecting systemic inflammation was > 41.7 ch in dogs (sensitivity 80%; specificity 66%) and > 37.4 ch in cats (sensitivity 75%; specificity 67%). NE-SFL was positively correlated with APPs, WCC, neutrophil count, and band neutrophil count in both species. NE-SSC was positively correlated with APPs in both species and, in dogs, also with WCC, neutrophil count, and band neutrophil count. CONCLUSION: CPD, particularly NE-SFL, is a promising marker of inflammation in dogs and cats and could be especially useful when APP quantification or blood smear examination are unavailable.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toole et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: