Why the study?
Cardiomyocytes from human induced pluripotent stem cells can be used to study genetic cardiac diseases, but classifying different diseases and healthy controls using calcium transient data required evaluation with expanded disease sets and validation methods.
Can machine learning algorithms accurately classify different genetic cardiac diseases using calcium transient data from patient-specific iPSC-CMs?
Can machine learning algorithms accurately classify different genetic cardiac diseases using calcium transient data from patient-specific iPSC-CMs?
Machine learning applied to calcium transient data from iPSC-CMs can effectively classify various genetic cardiac diseases, offering a potential computational approach for disease modeling.
Supports ML classification of genetic cardiac diseases in iPSC-CMs; leaves open clinical validation and translation.
Cardiomyocytes differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-CMs) can be used to study genetic cardiac diseases. In patients these diseases are manifested e.g. with impaired contractility and fatal cardiac arrhythmias, and both of these can be due to abnormal calcium transients in cardiomyocytes. Here we classify different genetic cardiac diseases using Ca2+ transient data and different machine learning algorithms. By studying calcium cycling of disease-specific iPSC-CMs and by using calcium transients measured from these cells it is possible to classify diseases from each other and also from healthy controls by applying machine learning computation on the basis of peak attributes detected from calcium transient signals. In the current research we extend our previous study having Ca-transient data from four different genetic diseases by adding data from two additional diseases (dilated cardiomyopathy and long QT Syndrome 2). We also study, in the light of the current data, possible differences and relations when machine learning modelling and classification accuracies were computed by using either leave-one-out test or 10-fold cross-validation. Despite more complex classification tasks compared to our earlier research and having more different genetic cardiac diseases in the analysis, it is still possible to attain good disease classification results. As excepted, leave-one-out test and 10-fold cross-validation achieved virtually equal results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juhola et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: