Why the study?
Patients with POTS or nOH use compression garments to reduce venous pooling and increase cardiac output, but end-user opinions of these products were unknown.
What are the end-user opinions and preferences regarding different types of compression products in patients with POTS or nOH?
What are the end-user opinions and preferences regarding different types of compression products in patients with POTS or nOH?
Existing compression products do not fully meet the needs of patients with POTS or nOH, highlighting a consumer demand for novel, comfortable, and low-profile abdominal compression garments.
Patient preferences highlight trade-offs in POTS/nOH compression; hypothesis-generating for novel comfortable, low-profile designs.
Background/Objectives: Patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) or neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) experience vertigo, confusion, and syncope. Compression garments help reduce venous pooling in these patients, thereby increasing cardiac output. We aimed to determine end-user opinions of compression products intended to alleviate symptoms for POTS and nOH. Methods: This was a survey study sampling participants diagnosed with POTS or nOH. The data collected included demographics, medical history, and compression garments previously used. The participants rated their most frequently used garment across comfort, aesthetic appeal, ease of use, durability, cost-effectiveness, efficacy, and consistency on the Likert scale (1–5). One-way ANOVA was used to compare the design criteria ratings across garments. For all tests α = 0.05. Results: Of the 330 POTS and 28 nOH participants surveyed (mean age 37.9, mean BMI 27.5, 95.0% women, 90.5% White), 354 (98.9%) reported trying at least one compression garment since their diagnosis. The majority of participants reported using leg compression most frequently rather than shapewear or abdominal compression (65.4% vs. 20.1% vs. 13.4%, respectively). Approximately 67.0% of participants tried multiple product types. Shapewear was reported to have greater concealability compared to abdominal or leg compression garments (mean 3.43 vs. 2.90 vs. 2.91, respectively; p < 0.01). Shapewear and abdominal compression were rated to be less comfortable compared to leg compression (2.67 vs. 2.94 vs. 3.05, respectively; p = 0.03). Conclusions: The existing compression products do not fully meet needs of individuals with POTS or nOH, as evidenced by participant ratings on multiple domains. There is potential consumer demand for novel adjustable abdominal compression garments that are low-profile and comfortable when disengaged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitra et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: