Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, three different nanoparticles—SiO 2, TiO 2, and Al 2 O 3 —were employed to enhance the CO 2 gas absorption by monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent. It is observed that, with increased solids loading, the total mass-transfer enhancement has a tendency to be dominated by the bubble breaking effect. It is concluded that nanoparticles result in an increased CO 2 absorption rate of >10%. On the other hand, nanoparticles exhibit much more attractive impact on CO 2 desorption. Under the same desorption extent, solvent with 0.1 wt % TiO 2 nanoparticles saved 42% desorption time, compared to that without nanoparticles. Under higher heat flux density, more input heat would be supplied to the heat of desorption, rather than the heat of water evaporation, which is due to the enhancement of desorption rate by nanoparticles. The issue of particle aggregation was also investigated by analyzing the size distribution of nanoparticle clusters and zeta potential of MEA solvents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: