Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial post hoc analysis shows no clinical impact from pharmacokinetic variations in chronic plaque psoriasis, suggesting consistent therapeutic efficacy.
DMB-3115 is a biosimilar to ustekinumab (Stelara ® ). Although a single-dose study conducted in Europe showed that the pharmacokinetics of DMB-3115 was equivalent to that of ustekinumab, another single-dose study in Japan suggested that the maximum serum concentration ( C max ) of DMB-3115 might be slightly lower than that of ustekinumab in the Japanese population. Thus, we conducted a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled studies. The single-dose DMB-3115-1 and DMB-3115-3 studies enrolled healthy participants. The DMB-3115-2 study enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. It comprised 2 periods (Weeks 0–28 and 28–52), and we used the data through Week 12, during which patients received the assigned treatments at Weeks 0 and 4. Across all studies, participants were randomized to receive subcutaneous DMB-3115 or Stelara. We conducted regression analysis to investigate the relationships between the C max and efficacy outcomes using the data of participants receiving DMB-3115 or Stelara in the DMB-3115-2 study. We also conducted population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis using the data of participants receiving DMB-3115 in the DMB-3115-1, -2, and -3 studies. Based on its results, we simulated the C max in the Japanese population. In the regression analysis, the combined C max of DMB-3115 and ustekinumab was not statistically associated with the percent change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline to Week 12 or PASI-75 achievement (at least 75% improvement from baseline) at Week 12. Additionally, the gradual slopes of the regression line and curve suggested that the difference in C max is not expected to have a meaningful impact on clinical efficacy. In the population PK analysis, the simulated maximum concentrations in the Japanese population were within the range of those observed in the DMB-3115-2 study. The difference in C max of DMB-3115 is not expected to have a meaningful impact on its efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konishi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: