This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: STELLAR-2 assessed the equivalent efficacy of the ustekinumab biosimilar, Bmab 1200, versus reference ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also evaluated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 3 study, patients were randomized 1:1 to Bmab 1200 or reference ustekinumab in Treatment Period (TP)1, and at Week 16, those who responded to reference ustekinumab (improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score ≥ 50%) were re-randomized (1:1) to continue reference ustekinumab or switch to Bmab 1200 in TP2. The primary endpoint was the change in PASI from baseline to Week 12. Equivalent efficacy was established if 90% and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins of ± 10% and ± 13%, respectively. At Week 12, the least squares mean treatment difference (0.6800%; 90% CI: -1.27, 2.63; 95% CI: -1.64, 3.00) was within the predefined equivalence margins for 90% and 95% CIs. Safety, immunogenicity, and PK were comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bmab 1200 and reference ustekinumab had similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu identifier is 2021-006668-25; www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05335356.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szepietowski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: