Though the nature and characteristics of ecotourism in other parts of Australia and in other countries have been examined, little is known about ecotourism in Western Australia. This paper represents a first step and reports on the results of a survey of Western Australian ecotourism tour operators. The paper is simple, descriptive-level case study and its value lies in the relatively scant knowledge base. Data were obtained using questionnaires administered by either face-to-face surveyor by mail to nineteen of Western Australia's thirty ecotourism operators during 1992The results indicate that there is no universal definition of ecotourism shared by the operators but rather a range of elements focused on the enjoyment and appreciation of the natural environment. The operators are engaged in a number of different ecotourism activities of which the most common are bushwalking and wildlife watching.The operators suggest that there are both positive and negative impacts associated with ecotourism but they believe that their operations are environmentally responsible Adverse impacts reported include damage to vegetation, disturbance of wildlife, soil erosion and compaction, water pollution and noise.It is concluded that, although ecotourism in Western Australia has the potential for sustainable, low impact tourism, it also has the potential to destroy the natural base on which it depends. A suggestion is made for the development of codes of ethics and practice to guide the developers and operators of ecotourism in future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finucane et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: