Panel study reveals spatial clustering and positive dependence between production and emissions in dairy farms, indicating that omitting location biases environmental inefficiency estimates.
Measuring technical and environmental inefficiency jointly while accounting for unobserved spatial heterogeneity remains a key challenge in production analysis. Existing studies typically model these dimensions separately or ignore spatial variation, potentially biasing inefficiency estimates. This study presents a semiparametric, spline-based by-production stochastic frontier model that jointly models marketable and polluting outputs, captures their dependence using copulas, and incorporates spatial heterogeneity through thin plate splines. The model is applied to a panel dataset of Dutch dairy farms with detailed production, emission, and geographic information. The results reveal nonlinear input–output relationships, low inefficiency levels, and positive upper tail dependence between production and emissions. Environmental inefficiency exhibits distinct spatial patterns, with clusters of high and low inefficiency. Ignoring spatial heterogeneity inflates environmental inefficiency, underestimates its variance, and deteriorates model fit. These findings highlight the importance of jointly modeling production and emissions while accounting for spatial factors for accurate efficiency measurement and policy design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ioannis Skevas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: