Textual analysis reveals the emergence of 'national water' in postcolonial South Asian narratives, highlighting how environmental division reinforces post-Partition geopolitical hostility.
I read two texts – the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT, 1960) and Saadat Hasan Manto’s short story, “Yazid” (1951) – within the context of postcolonial Indian politics. I treat water as a hydrosocial production, i.e. as the product of social, spatial, and ecological relations. I ask what textual ideas of water tell us about the social relations that constitute them and, conversely, how the ideas contribute to reshaping social relations. I argue that attending to literary and discursive constructions of water reveals the new imagination of water that emerges in the subcontinent post-Partition. This new imagination – what I term “national water” – reflects the violence, imagined and realized, of Partition. The conceptualization of the divided hydroscape of the Indus Basin reinforces the narrative of a natural hostility between India and Pakistan and the inevitability of separation. The contemporaneous promises and violences contained in the IWT and “Yazid” remind us, I suggest, of the close relationship that exists between the processes of nation building and the material and imaginative transformation of environments in postcolonial India.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manasvini Rajan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: