Continuous monitoring study reveals building-level factors drive most indoor radon variability across operational schedules, indicating time-averaged metrics may obscure exposure risks.
Indoor radon is a leading source of natural radiation exposure, and its indoor concentrations vary substantially with building operation and ventilation conditions. Despite this, radon management in public facilities continues to rely on time-averaged measurements, which can obscure short-term accumulation episodes tied to occupancy and operational schedules. High-resolution continuous radon monitoring was conducted in 11 community service centers in Jeollanam-do, Korea, to characterize time-segmented concentration variability under real operational conditions. Hourly data were classified into four operational periods — working hours, extended working hours, non-working hours, and weekends — and analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model (LMM). Substantial inter-facility variability was observed across all concentration metrics. Radon concentrations were lowest during extended working hours and increased progressively during non-working hours and weekends. Variance decomposition attributed approximately 70% of total variability to facility-level differences (ICC ≈ 0.69), indicating that building-specific baseline characteristics exert a stronger influence on indoor radon exposure than operational time effects. Facility-specific temporal response patterns were further examined using continuous sensitivity indices alongside LMM-derived random intercepts, showing that temporal sensitivity and baseline radon level are not consistently related across facilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: