Key result
Obesity is linked to ~400% higher odds of developing metabolic syndrome vs normal weight.
Why the study?
What risk factors and protective factors are associated with the development of metabolic syndrome?
Systematic Review
What risk factors and protective factors are associated with the development of metabolic syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 5 (95% CI 3.61–6.93)
This umbrella review emphasizes that unhealthy dietary patterns, sedentary behaviors, obesity, and adverse occupational patterns are the primary modifiable risk factors for metabolic syndrome, requiring targeted public health interventions.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) - a cluster of conditions including hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and central obesity - affects 20–30% of adults globally and elevates risks for type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Although extensive research has been conducted on individual risk factors, a comprehensive synthesis of existing evidence is urgently required to guide the development of targeted, multi-component prevention strategies. To identify observational studies which assessed the association between MetS development and risk factors, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database were searched from inception to May 2025. A random or fix-effects model was utilized to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs), relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Statistical heterogeneity across included studies was quantified using the I² index, where values > 50% were considered indicative of substantial heterogeneity. The Egger’s test or funnel graph was used to assess the methodological quality. This umbrella review systematically analyzed 72 meta-analyses from 7,367 unique articles to evaluate associations between 101 factors and MetS development. 76 positively correlated factors and 25 negatively correlated factors were identified from the included studies and categorized into five distinct domains: lifestyle behaviors, pre-existing diseases, individual characteristics, environmental exposures, and occupational factors. From the selected studies, the most significantly positive correlation with MetS was overweight and obesity. Parental history of MetS, gestational diabetes mellitus, high screen time, and shift work were also exhibited high degrees of correlation with MetS. In our study, we also identified several modifiable dietary factors exhibited negative correlations with MetS. High-fiber diet consumption, regular nut intake, and adherence to a Mediterranean diet had higher association with MetS. MetS pathophysiology is multifactorial. Comprehensive evidence shows that multiple distinct factors performed significantly associations with MetS. Unhealthy dietary patterns, sedentary behavioral patterns, and adverse occupational patterns are the primary modifiable associated factors for MetS. Despite the limited quality of current supporting evidence, targeted intervention strategies for these factors should be prioritized in public health policies to mitigate MetS at the population level. This review provides comprehensive prevention suggestions for high-risk groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Metabolic syndrome. Overweight and obesity vs. Normal or low body weight was evaluated on Development of metabolic syndrome (OR 5.00, 95% CI 3.61-6.93). Overweight and obesity demonstrated the most significantly positive correlation with metabolic syndrome, with obese individuals having a 5-fold higher odds compared to those with normal or low body weight.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: