Key result
Automated light transmission aggregometry with the Sysmex CS-2100 i successfully identified all patients with impaired platelet function compared to the APACT 4004.
Why the study?
Manual light transmission aggregometry is the standard of care for platelet function testing but is error-prone and time-consuming, prompting evaluation of automated analyzers.
Does automated LTA with the Sysmex CS-2100 i analyzer provide reliable agreement with manual LTA using the APACT 4004 for platelet function testing?
Observational (n=123)
Does automated LTA with the Sysmex CS-2100 i analyzer provide reliable agreement with manual LTA using the APACT 4004 for platelet function testing?
Automated light transmission aggregometry with the CS-2100 i is a reliable method that successfully identifies impaired platelet function, potentially simplifying routine clinical testing.
Platelet function (PF) plays a pivotal role in both hemostasis and thrombosis, and manual light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered the standard of care for platelet function testing but is an error-prone and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to test the agreement regarding maximum aggregation (MA), velocity (VEL), and lag-phase (LagP) of platelet aggregation of the automated Sysmex CS-2100 i analyzer (Siemens, Germany) against the APACT 4004 (Elitech, France) in samples derived from healthy participants and patients with hemostaseologic disorders. In total, 123 patient-derived samples were investigated, including 42 patients with acetylsalicylic acid and/or clopidogrel intake and 20 patients with other hemostaseologic disorders. Both MA and VEL showed good or excellent intermethod correlation. Agreement between the testing methods was only partially achieved, and values were indicative for a systematic bias to lower measurements below a threshold of 50% MA with the CS-2100 i compared to the APACT 4004. All patients with impaired PF in the APACT 4004 were successfully identified with the CS-2100 i, and reference values for automated LTA are provided. Conclusively, automated LTA with the CS-2100 i is a highly standardized and reliable PF testing method and represents a decisive step in the simplification of platelet function testing in clinical routine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stratmann et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy participants and patients with hemostaseologic disorders (n=123). Automated Sysmex CS-2100 i analyzer vs. APACT 4004 analyzer was evaluated on Agreement regarding maximum aggregation (MA), velocity (VEL), and lag-phase (LagP) of platelet aggregation. Automated light transmission aggregometry with the Sysmex CS-2100 i successfully identified all patients with impaired platelet function compared to the APACT 4004.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: