Why the study?
Does female sex protect against the development of cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in a murine model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
Does female sex protect against the development of cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in a murine model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“This study reveals different drug targets in males and females and will be a stepping-stone for future trials with sex-specific targeted drugs in HFpEF.”
“If these same molecular male-female distinctions occur in obese diabetic patients with HFpEF, it may mean that the best therapeutic strategies for HFpEF in women may differ from those for men.”
In a murine model of HFpEF, female sex intrinsically protects against cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction independently of sex hormones, challenging the traditional belief of higher female susceptibility.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: