Key result
Nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly longer atrial electromechanical delay postablation compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (P < 0.05).
Why the study?
Data on the variation of atrial electromechanical delay in the early phase after catheter ablation in patients with AF were lacking.
Does atrial electromechanical delay differ between patients with nonparoxysmal versus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the early phase after catheter ablation?
Observational (n=55)
Does atrial electromechanical delay differ between patients with nonparoxysmal versus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the early phase after catheter ablation?
p-value: p=<0.05
Patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation exhibit longer atrial electromechanical delay and an abrupt decrease in the initial hours post-ablation compared to those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Prolonged postablation atrial electromechanical delay in nonparoxysmal AF is hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed to clarify prognostic value.
BACKGROUND: Variation of atrial electromechanical delay (AED) in early phase after catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is lacking. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients restored sinus rhythm after ablation was included. Echocardiography was performed at 4 h, 1 day, and 3 days after radiofrequency catheter ablation, and AED was measured simultaneously by echocardiography with pulse Doppler imaging and pulse wave tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: AED parameters were significantly longer in the nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) group than in the paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) group at each checking point after ablation (P < 0.05). Compared with other checking points, AED parameters were significantly longer 4 h postablation in the NPAF group, while no significant difference was found between different checking points in the PAF group. AED-leap, representing the variation of AED in NPAF patients, was significantly positively correlated with the duration of NPAF (r = 0.5291, P = 0.0113). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PAF, NPAF patients have a longer AED postablation, and an abrupt decrease in the initial-h postablation. Such phenomenon gives rise to the different clinical features of PAF and NPAF, and could guide different assessment and treatment strategies for different types of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=55). Nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was evaluated on Atrial electromechanical delay (AED) (p=<0.05). Nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly longer atrial electromechanical delay postablation compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: