Key result
Interatrial electromechanical delay was independently associated with atrial fibrillation attacks in hemodialysis patients (OR 1.230; 95% CI 1.104-1.370; p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does atrial electromechanical delay predict attacks of atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients?
Observational (n=77)
Does atrial electromechanical delay predict attacks of atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.23 (95% CI 1.104–1.37)
p-value: p=<0.001
Interatrial electromechanical delay measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography is an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients.
May support AF risk stratification in hemodialysis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background and objective: Prevalence of atrial fibrillation is higher in hemodialysis patients as compared to the general population. Atrial electromechanical delay is known as a significant predictor of atrial fibrillation. In this study, we aimed to reveal the relationship between atrial electromechanical delay and attacks of atrial fibrillation. Materials and methods: The study included 77 hemodialysis patients over 18 years of age giving written consent to participate in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the results of 24-h Holter Electrocardiogram (Holter ECG) as the ones having attacks of atrial fibrillation and the others without any attack of atrial fibrillation. Standard echocardiographic measurements were taken from all patients. Additionally, atrial conduction times were measured by tissue Doppler technique and atrial electromechanical delays were calculated. Results: Intra- and interatrial electromechanical delay were found as significantly lengthened in the group of patients with attacks of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001 respectively). The optimal cut-off time for interatrial electromechanical delay to predict atrial fibrillation was >21 ms with a specificity of 79.3% and a sensitivity of 73.7% (area under the curve 0.820; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.716–0.898). In the multivariate logistic regression model, interatrial electromechanical delay (odds ratio = 1.230; 95% CI, 1.104–1.370; p < 0.001) and hypertension (odds ratio = 4.525; 95% CI, 1.042–19.651; p = 0.044) were also associated with atrial fibrillation after adjustment for variables found to be statistically significant in univariate analysis and correlated with interatrial electromechanical delay. Conclusions: Interatrial electromechanical delay is independently related with the attacks of atrial fibrillation detected on Holter ECG records in hemodialysis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Güneş et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Hemodialysis (n=77). Interatrial electromechanical delay was evaluated on Attacks of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.230, 95% CI 1.104-1.370, p=<0.001). Interatrial electromechanical delay was independently associated with atrial fibrillation attacks in hemodialysis patients (OR 1.230; 95% CI 1.104-1.370; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: