Key result
Clopidogrel resulted in a higher rate of recurrent ACS (18.2%) compared to ticagrelor in PCI-treated ACS patients with diabetes and CYP2C19 LOF alleles (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Diabetes and CYP2C19 loss of function alleles are linked to variable antiplatelet response to clopidogrel, prompting comparison with ticagrelor across these subgroups in ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Does clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor affect recurrent ACS and platelet reactivity in PCI-treated ACS patients stratified by diabetes and CYP2C19 polymorphism?
RCT (n=948)
1:1
Does clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor affect recurrent ACS and platelet reactivity in PCI-treated ACS patients stratified by diabetes and CYP2C19 polymorphism?
p-value: p=<0.05
In PCI-treated ACS patients, the combination of diabetes and CYP2C19 LOF alleles significantly increases the risk of recurrent ACS and high platelet reactivity when treated with clopidogrel compared to ticagrelor.
Supports ticagrelor over clopidogrel in this subgroup; extends CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 selection evidence to diabetic ACS patients.
Diabetes and CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) alleles are associated with the variable antiplatelet activity of the prodrug clopidogrel. We conducted a randomized trial (NCT03613857) to compare the combined and individualized effects of diabetes and CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the antiplatelet reactivity of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients (948, 1 year follow-up 943) were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either clopidogrel or ticagrelor, after PCI; patients were subdivided into 8 subgroups according to the diabetes and/or CYP2C19 allele status. The study outcomes were recurrent ACS, maximum platelet aggregation (MPA), high platelet reactivity index (PRI), and incidence of major bleeding events. Diabetic patients with LOF alleles taking clopidogrel had the highest recurrent ACS rate (6 of 33 patients) versus all other study groups (P < 0.05). However, both drugs had similar proportions of recurrent ACS in all other subgroups. Similarly, both PRI and MPA were significantly higher in the diabetic patients having LOF alleles and receiving clopidogrel versus all their study groups (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, ticagrelor caused higher rates of major bleeding versus clopidogrel (P < 0.001). PCI-treated ACS patients with diabetes and CYP2C19 LOF alleles are at a higher risk of recurrent ACS and high PRI/MPA, when treated with clopidogrel versus ticagrelor, but almost comparable outcomes are recorded in the absence of 1 or the 2 risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohareb et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=948). Clopidogrel vs. Ticagrelor was evaluated on Recurrent ACS (p=<0.05). Clopidogrel resulted in a higher rate of recurrent ACS (18.2%) compared to ticagrelor in PCI-treated ACS patients with diabetes and CYP2C19 LOF alleles (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: