Key result
Pocket haematoma following pacemaker or CRT implantation was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (2.0% vs. 0.7%, P<0.001), longer length of stay, and increased costs.
Why the study?
Does pocket haematoma after pacemaker and CRT implantation worsen in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization costs?
Observational (n=78,751)
Yes
Does pocket haematoma after pacemaker and CRT implantation worsen in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization costs?
Pocket haematoma after pacemaker or CRT implantation is a common complication that significantly increases in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and healthcare costs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires vigilant post-implant monitoring; leaves open whether prevention reduces mortality or costs.
AIMS: Pocket haematoma is a common complication following pacemaker implantation. Impact of this complication on post-procedural outcomes has previously not been systematically studied. We sought to identify the incidence of pocket haematoma after a de novo pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation and evaluate its impact on the hospital outcomes using a large all-payer national inpatient database. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2010 was queried to identify all primary implantations of single chamber, dual chamber pacemakers, and biventricular devices during the year 2010 using the appropriate ICD-9 codes. Patients who experienced a procedure-related haematoma during the hospital stay were identified. Of a total of 78,751 primary pacemaker implantations in the year 2010, 1677 (2.1%) of the implantations were complicated by a pocket haematoma. Higher age groups, more complex pacemaker types (BiV > dual chamber > single chamber), and comorbidities such as congestive heart failure and coagulopathy were associated with an increased risk of pocket haematoma formation post-pacemaker implantation. Patients who developed a pocket haematoma had a longer length of stay (8.7 vs. 4.8 days, P < 0.001), higher hospitalization costs ($48,815 vs. $34,324, P < 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (2.0 vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) compared with patients who did not develop a haematoma. CONCLUSIONS: Haematoma is a relatively common complication associated with pacemaker implantation; however, it adversely impacts in-hospital outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sridhar et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation (n=78,751). Pocket haematoma vs. No pocket haematoma was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=< 0.001). Pocket haematoma following pacemaker or CRT implantation was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (2.0% vs. 0.7%, P<0.001), longer length of stay, and increased costs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: