Key result
Surface landmark guided blind axillary vein puncture achieved a 100% success rate, with implantation times not significantly longer than the venography-based approach.
Why the study?
Does surface landmark guided blind axillary vein puncture improve safety and efficiency compared to contrast venography guided technique in patients undergoing pacemaker or ICD lead implantation?
Observational (n=20)
Does surface landmark guided blind axillary vein puncture improve safety and efficiency compared to contrast venography guided technique in patients undergoing pacemaker or ICD lead implantation?
Surface landmark-guided blind axillary vein puncture is an effective and safe alternative to contrast venography for pacemaker and ICD lead implantation, avoiding unnecessary radiation and contrast exposure.
Supports blind axillary access to limit contrast exposure; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To develop surface landmarks for blind axillary vein puncture for pacemaker lead implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients for routine coronary angiography were counseled for participating in our study. 20 patients who gave consent were taken up for axillary venogram after proper positioning at the time of coronary angiogram. The venograms of these 20 patients, were reviewed and the landmarks were used to develop a blind axillary puncture technique. Success rate of 100% was achieved with surface landmark guided axillary vein puncture. The implantation time while using surface landmark guided axillary puncture was not significantly longer than when venography based approach was used. Another interesting observation made from the study was that increasing BMI had a positive correlation with the time taken for venous access, the fluoroscopic time and the volume of contrast used, all the associations being statistically significant. Thus, the surface landmark guided technique is more safe and expeditious in non obese patients and probably in pediatric patients as well. Moreover, the new surface landmark guided approach is a significant safety step in terms of reducing the unwanted and avoidable radiation exposure to the hands. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that placement of endocardial permanent pacemaker and ICD leads via the developed surface landmarks is effective and safe and is devoid of the harmful effects of radiation and contrast exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehrotra et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation (n=20). Surface landmark guided blind axillary vein puncture vs. Contrast venography guided technique was evaluated on Success rate of axillary vein puncture. Surface landmark guided blind axillary vein puncture achieved a 100% success rate, with implantation times not significantly longer than the venography-based approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: