Key result
Roadmap fluoroscopy real-time guided axillary vein puncture achieved a higher success rate compared with blind puncture (95.2% vs 78.7%; P<0.001) in cardiac pacemaker implantation.
Why the study?
Roadmap fluoroscopy had never previously been evaluated for axillary vein puncture in clinical practice.
Does roadmap fluoroscopy real-time guidance improve axillary vein success rate in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation compared to blind puncture?
Cohort (n=178)
No
Does roadmap fluoroscopy real-time guidance improve axillary vein success rate in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation compared to blind puncture?
Real-time roadmap fluoroscopy guidance for axillary vein puncture during pacemaker implantation improves procedural success rates and reduces complications compared to blind puncture.
Roadmap fluoroscopy was associated with higher success and fewer complications versus blind puncture in this cohort; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objective : Roadmap fluoroscopy has never previously been evaluated for axillary vein puncture in clinical practice. Our retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of axillary vein puncture real-time guided by roadmap fluoroscopy in cardiac pacemaker implantation. Methods and Results : A total of 178 patients undergoing axillary vein puncture in permanent pacemaker implantation were included in the present cohort study during a 1-year period at our institution. All procedures were performed by the operators with previous experience in axillary approach. Primary endpoint was defined as axillary vein success rate. Secondary endpoints were venous access site change, time to obtain venous access, procedural time, and complication rate. For the primary outcomes, a higher success rate was observed in the roadmap group compared with the blind puncture group (95.2% vs 78.7%; P <0.001), as well as a lower rate of venous access site change (7.1% vs 35.1%; P <0.001) and shorter time to obtain venous access and procedural time, with lower complications (3.6 % vs 6.4 %; P <0.01). Conclusion: The roadmap fluoroscopy real-time guided axillary venous access is safer and has a better success rate and faster execution time compared with the blind axillary puncture in cardiac pacemaker implantation. However, further larger scale prospective randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in cardiac pacemaker implantation (n=178). Roadmap fluoroscopy real-time guided axillary vein puncture vs. Blind axillary puncture was evaluated on axillary vein success rate (p=<0.001). Roadmap fluoroscopy real-time guided axillary vein puncture achieved a higher success rate compared with blind puncture (95.2% vs 78.7%; P<0.001) in cardiac pacemaker implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: