Key result
Higher hospital pacemaker implantation volume was associated with significantly lower rates of early surgical complications (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.78 for 51-90 vs 1-50 implantations/year).
Why the study?
Does higher hospital procedure volume reduce early complications in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation?
Cohort (n=430,416)
Yes
Does higher hospital procedure volume reduce early complications in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation?
Higher annual hospital pacemaker implantation volume is associated with significantly shorter procedural times and lower rates of early surgical complications and lead dislocations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher-volume centers may have fewer pacemaker complications; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
AIMS: Several studies demonstrated an inverse relationship between cardioverter-defibrillator implantation volume and complication rates, suggesting better outcomes for higher volume centres. However, the association of institutional procedural volume with patient outcomes for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remains less known, especially in decentralized implantation systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed retrospective examination of data on patients undergoing PPM from the German obligatory quality assurance programme (2007-12) to evaluate the relationship of hospital PPM volume (categorized into quintiles of their mean annual volume) with risk-adjusted in-hospital surgical complications (composite of pneumothorax, haemothorax, pericardial effusion, or pocket haematoma, all requiring intervention, or device infection) and pacemaker lead dislocation. Overall 430 416 PPM implantations were documented in 1226 hospitals. Systems included dual (72.8%) and single (25.8%) chamber PPM and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices (1.1%). Complications included surgical (0.92%), and ventricular (0.99%), and atrial (1.22%) lead dislocation. Despite an increase in relatively complex procedures (dual chamber, CRT), there was a significant decrease in the procedural and fluoroscopy times and complications from lowest to highest implantation volume quintiles (P for trend <0.0001). The greatest difference was observed between the lowest (1-50 implantations/year-reference group) and the second-lowest (51-90 implantations/year) quintile: surgical complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.69; confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.78], atrial lead dislocations (OR 0.69; CI 0.59-0.80), and ventricular lead dislocations (OR 0.73; CI 0.63-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital annual PPM volume was directly related to indication-based implantation of relatively more complex PPM and yet inversely with procedural times and rates of early surgical complications and lead dislocations. Thus, our data suggest better performance and lower complications with increasing procedural volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowak et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (n=430,416). Hospital permanent pacemaker implantation volume vs. Lowest volume quintile (1-50 implantations/year) was evaluated on In-hospital surgical complications (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.78, p=<0.0001). Higher hospital pacemaker implantation volume was associated with significantly lower rates of early surgical complications (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.78 for 51-90 vs 1-50 implantations/year).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: