Why the study?
Does operator volume rather than hospital volume determine complications in pacemaker implantations?
Does operator volume rather than hospital volume determine complications in pacemaker implantations?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Operator experience, rather than hospital volume, is the primary determinant of complications in pacemaker implantations, suggesting a need to revise training requirements and concentrate procedures among fewer operators.
Literature about pacemaker (PM) implantations shows that several clinical and technical factors determine the short- and long-term complications after the intervention. Annual hospital volume, however, does not negatively affect complications in contrast with the cumulative experience of the operator. In view of this observation, the current required number of 20 to 30 first PM implantations for cardiology training does not match standards for quality of care. In addition, concentration of implants and replacement of pacemakers to a limited number of operators per hospital to comply with the increasing demands of patients and other parties has to be seriously considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norbert M. van Hemel (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: