Key result
Higher operator experience was associated with better leadless pacemaker implantation quality (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.00-1.19; P=0.05) and increased procedural efficiency.
Why the study?
Recent real-world data raised concerns regarding the learning curve of new operators and implantation quality during leadless pacemaker implantation.
Does operator experience improve implantation quality and procedural efficiency in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation?
Population
111 Micra TPS implantation cases across two large tertiary referral hospitals
Comparison
Implantation quality and procedural efficiency across different levels of operator experience
Design
Bicentric observational analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports learning-curve effects in leadless pacing; hypothesis-generating for experience thresholds before practice change.
Observational (n=111)
Yes
Does operator experience improve implantation quality and procedural efficiency in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation?
Odds Ratio: 1.09 (95% CI 1–1.19)
p-value: p=0.05
Operator experience is significantly associated with higher implantation quality and procedural efficiency during leadless pacemaker implantation, highlighting the importance of the learning curve.
Haeberlin et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Leadless cardiac pacemaker implantation (n=111). Operator experience vs. Less operator experience was evaluated on Implantation quality (absence of complications, good electrical performance, acceptable fluoroscopy duration) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19, p=0.05). Higher operator experience was associated with better leadless pacemaker implantation quality (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.00-1.19; P=0.05) and increased procedural efficiency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: