Key result
Intra-pocket mapping and antero-inferior S-ICD generator repositioning enabled successful R-wave sensing and 65 J defibrillation threshold testing in 2 of 2 patients after posterior placement failed.
Why the study?
Although posterior chest S-ICD implantation is recommended for defibrillation outcomes, little is known about optimal positioning for R-wave detection.
Does intra-pocket electrical mapping and antero-inferior S-ICD generator repositioning improve R-wave detection and sensing test success in patients with intraoperative sensing failure at the posterior chest position?
Case Report (n=2)
No
Does intra-pocket electrical mapping and antero-inferior S-ICD generator repositioning improve R-wave detection and sensing test success in patients with intraoperative sensing failure at the posterior chest position?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intra-pocket electrical mapping with antero-inferior S-ICD generator relocation is a feasible non-invasive bailout technique when standard posterior chest positioning fails intraoperative R-wave sensing tests in patients with low R-wave or high T-wave amplitudes.
Background: A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is an alternative to a conventional transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator for preventing sudden cardiac death. Although posterior chest S-ICD implantation has been recommended for better defibrillation outcomes, little is known about the optimal S-ICD positioning for R-wave detection. Herein, we report two cases of S-ICD recipients in whom antero-inferior chest positioning improved R-wave detection after posterior chest positioning failed. Case summary: Two patients experienced intraoperative S-ICD sensing test failures despite passing the preoperative screening. The first case was a 66-year-old man with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and superior vena cava syndrome due to transvenous leads. After lead extraction and initial S-ICD placement in the posterior of the mid-chest line, sensing tests failed in all vectors. We performed intra-pocket mapping and repositioning to the antero-inferior chest position, which enabled R-wave detection and a successful defibrillation threshold test. The second case involved a 34-year-old man with short QT syndrome, whose intraoperative sensing tests also failed in all vectors. Antero-inferior repositioning of the S-ICD generator achieved acceptable R-wave detection without T-wave over-sensing and defibrillation threshold test failure. Discussion: These cases highlight the utility of intra-pocket mapping to optimize S-ICD positioning for R-wave detection in patients with challenging electrocardiogram characteristics. Posterior chest positioning may not be optimal for R-wave detection, particularly in patients with low R-wave and/or high T-wave amplitudes. Repositioning the device closer to the left ventricular apex improved sensing test results, supporting antero-inferior chest placement as a potential solution when posterior chest placement fails.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitami et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) recipients with intraoperative sensing test failure (arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and short QT syndrome) (n=2). Intra-pocket electrical mapping and antero-inferior S-ICD generator repositioning vs. Standard posterior chest S-ICD generator positioning was evaluated on Intraoperative R-wave sensing test success and defibrillation threshold (DFT) test success. Intra-pocket mapping and antero-inferior S-ICD generator repositioning enabled successful R-wave sensing and 65 J defibrillation threshold testing in 2 of 2 patients after posterior placement failed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: