Key result
Sacubitril/Valsartan reduced the composite risk of cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization by 20% compared to enalapril (HR 0.80) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Why the study?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional therapies in patients with heart failure?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional therapies in patients with heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.8 (95% CI 0.73–0.87)
Absolute Event Rate: 21.8% vs 26.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Sacubitril/valsartan offers superior efficacy and quality of life improvements over traditional ACE inhibitors for HFrEF, though its cost-effectiveness remains dependent on regional willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Strengthens sacubitril/valsartan case in HFrEF; leaves open cost-effectiveness at varying regional thresholds.
Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity across the globe. High prevalence, frequent hospitalization, longterm healthcare, absenteeism from work, and death upsurge the economic burden of the HF. For almost two decades, the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta-blockers (BBs) have remained the standard care of management for HF. But despite being efficacious and cost-effective theses standard treatment were unable reduce events of rehospitalization and improve quality of life for patients with HF. Recent innovative discovery of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy changed the entire outlook for management of HF. Sacubitril/Valsartan an ARNI proved out to be a revolutionary drug for patients of HF. Compared to other drug classes, Sacubitril/Valsartan combination therapy is more efficacious, have lesser adverse effect, and improves overall quality of life of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. However, the cost-effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan remained questionable in developing parts of world. At the current pricing Sacubitril/Valsartan was found to be cost-effective only at specific threshold of willingness to pay of the patients. Better Federal healthcare policies, new-pricing strategies, robust long-term real-world estimates of this drug are required to improve the cost-effective profile of this drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samer Ellahham (2018) conducted a review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=8,442). Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Enalapril 10 mg twice daily was evaluated on Composite of death from cardiovascular causes or a first hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.87, p=<0.001). Sacubitril/Valsartan reduced the composite risk of cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization by 20% compared to enalapril (HR 0.80) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: