Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study demonstrates superior pH sensitivity of MRAPTR over MTRasym in ischemic stroke patients, indicating improved detection of tissue acidosis independent of lesion volume.
Purpose To investigate the sensitivity of the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and magnetization transfer and relaxation-normalized APT rate (MRAPTR) in detecting the tissue acidosis in ischemic stroke, and to assess the influence of infarct volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and regions of interest (ROI) position. Method Ischemic stroke patients who met the inclusion criteria had a comprehensive MRI scan within 3 days of admission, including the APT sequence on a 3T MRI system. MTRasym and MRAPTR were obtained through the post-processing of APT data. The infarct volume, ADC, and ROI positions were also collected. McNemar’s test was used to compare the pH sensitivity of two APT metrics. Spearman correlation analysis was used to compare the relationships between infarct volume, ADC, and ROI position with MTRasym and MRAPTR. One-way ANOVA was used to assess differences of both metrics across three ROI locations. Results 147 patients (mean age, 62.17 years ± 0.92 [SD], 97 men) were evaluated. MRAPTR showed obviously better pH sensitivity than MTRasym for infarction ( p <0.001). The pH sensitivity of MTRasym appeared compromised by larger infarct volume and elevated ADC values, even the ROIs position ( p <0.05). In contrast, MRAPTR effectively mitigated the impact of these confounding factors, resulting in higher pH sensitivity. Conclusions MRAPTR demonstrated a higher sensitivity to tissue acidosis compared to MTRasym in APTw MRI. While MRAPTR effectively eliminates confounding influences from non-pH factors, but might still sensitive to the magnetic field inhomogeneities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: