Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hepatic artery thrombosis is a continuing source of morbidity and mortality following orthotopic liver transplantation. The cornerstone of therapy has been urgent retransplantation that is limited by organ availability. For this reason we developed a policy of urgent revascularization for allograft rescue. Hepatic artery thrombosis developed following 15 transplants of which 11 underwent urgent rearterialization. The diagnosis was made a mean of 4.8 days (range 1-10) following transplantation. Duplex ultrasonography was diagnostic in all patients and confirmed by angiography in 4 (36%). Three patients with hepatic artery thrombosis were identified following screening ultrasonography and were clinically unsuspected. Upon reexploration, a specific technical reason for hepatic artery was found in 4 patients (36%). Twelve arterial revascularization procedures were performed in 11 patients including: thrombectomy alone (n = 4); revision of anastomosis with thrombectomy (n = 5); and thrombectomy with placement of vascular conduit (n = 3). Following revascularization, 8 patients maintained hepatic artery patency. Three patients eventually required retransplantation secondary to biliary sepsis. Biliary tract complications developed in 6 patients, at a mean of 23 days following revascularization and included: breakdown of the biliary anastomosis (n = 4); stricture (n = 1); and sludge formation (n = 1). The overall graft and patient survival are 74% and 82% respectively, with a mean follow-up of 6.8 months. Hepatic allograft rescue with the use of urgent revascularization following hepatic artery thrombosis appears to be an effective means of either avoiding retransplantation or providing a bridge until a suitable donor becomes available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Langnas et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: