Why the study?
Does adherence to guideline recommendations reduce drug costs in patients with uncomplicated hypertension?
Does adherence to guideline recommendations reduce drug costs in patients with uncomplicated hypertension?
Adherence to hypertension guidelines could have saved $45-$108 million in Australia in 1998, highlighting a gap between clinical practice and recommendations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adherence to guidelines may lower drug costs in uncomplicated hypertension; reinforces monotherapy recommendations for both practice and research.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which "current guidelines" for the management of hypertension are reflected in the prescribing of antihypertensive drugs in Australia over the period 1994-1998, and to examine the cost implications of actual and recommended prescribing patterns. DESIGN: Federal Government and consumer cost estimates modelled on prescribing patterns and guideline recommendations over the period 1994-1998. SETTING: Prescribing on Federal Government pharmaceutical schemes over the 1994-1998 period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme/Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme cost changes in Australian dollar values. RESULTS: The implementation of current guidelines for patients with uncomplicated hypertension taking monotherapy alone could have reduced drug costs by $45-$108 million in 1998. CONCLUSIONS: Current prescribing patterns indicate that clinical practice has pre-empted the results from clinical trials of newer, more expensive agents and that clinicians' prescribing patterns do not closely reflect current recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nelson et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: